Arrest Guidelines — Section 498A Cases · 2 July 2014

Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar: Supreme Court Issues Guidelines Against Automatic Arrest

Supreme Court of India · (2014) 8 SCC 273; AIR 2014 SC 2756

The appellant, apprehending arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (cruelty by a husband or his relatives) and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act — offences carrying maximum sentences of three years and two years respectively — sought anticipatory bail. In examining the matter, the Supreme Court took note of the broader pattern of arrests being made in cognizable, non-bailable offences of this kind as a matter of routine upon registration of a complaint, without an assessment of whether arrest was actually necessary.

The Court held that for offences punishable with imprisonment of up to seven years, police officers must record their reasons for arrest with reference to the specific conditions set out in Section 41 of the Code of Criminal Procedure — such as a risk of the accused absconding or tampering with evidence — rather than arresting automatically upon registration of the case. Magistrates authorising further detention were similarly directed to record their satisfaction that these conditions are met. The guidelines were framed to apply generally to offences within this punishment bracket, with Section 498A cases cited as an illustration of the pattern the Court sought to address, following observations about the volume of complaints filed under that provision and the proportion later found not to warrant arrest.

More about this case →